The principles, regulations, and procedures governing academic quality, student learning, assessment, and continuous improvement across all educational programs.
A unified governance framework ensuring quality, transparency, and continuous improvement across the entire educational process at Yessenov University.
The Academic Policy defines the principles, regulations, and procedures governing the organization of the educational process, academic quality assurance, student learning experience, assessment, and continuous improvement of academic programs.
The policy is developed in accordance with national higher education regulations, institutional strategy, and international standards for quality assurance in higher education.
Transparent decision-making processes across all levels of academic management.
Student admission, registration, and academic advancement procedures.
Program development aligned with industry needs and international benchmarks.
Modern, student-centred pedagogical approaches and digital learning environments.
Fair, transparent, and outcomes-aligned examination and evaluation procedures.
Ethical standards, anti-plagiarism systems, and responsible AI use policies.
Comprehensive academic, psychological, and career guidance mechanisms.
Continuous improvement cycle driven by data, surveys, and stakeholder feedback.
Yessenov University ensures transparent academic governance through clearly defined decision-making structures at every level.
| Governing Body | Main Responsibilities |
|---|---|
| Academic Council | Approval of academic policies, educational strategies, and major academic decisions across the university. |
| Academic Quality Committee | Monitoring educational standards, conducting quality audits, and driving enhancement initiatives. |
| Faculty Councils | Curriculum review, program improvement discussions, and faculty-level academic governance. |
| Program Committees | Development, evaluation, and continuous improvement of individual educational programs. |
| Student Representatives | Formal participation in decision-making processes and structured feedback mechanisms. |
Educational programs are designed through a rigorous, multi-stakeholder process grounded in national frameworks and international benchmarks.
Program concept drafted based on stakeholder input and market analysis.
Faculty Council and Program Committee scrutiny and approval.
Industry partners and international experts provide feedback.
Academic Council formally approves the program for implementation.
Ongoing tracking, student feedback, and annual curriculum updates.
The university promotes modern educational approaches centred on active student participation, critical thinking, and real-world application.
Students solve real-world problems through collaborative, industry-linked projects.
Inquiry and evidence-based approaches integrated across all academic programs.
LMS platforms, digital resources, and technology-enhanced learning environments.
Workplace visits, live projects, and embedded professional practice across years.
Collaborative peer review, study groups, and peer mentoring programs.
Structured self-directed activities that build autonomy and lifelong learning skills.
Transparent, fair, and outcomes-aligned assessment procedures that recognise diverse ways of demonstrating knowledge and competence.
The university upholds the highest standards of academic honesty, ethical research, and responsible use of technology and AI.
Anti-plagiarism systems applied to all submitted work across all programs and levels.
Blind marking, standardised rubrics, and moderation to ensure objectivity.
Clear guidelines on the responsible and transparent use of AI tools in academic work.
Mandatory integrity training and orientation programs for all enrolled students.
Clear escalation pathways and proportionate sanctions for academic misconduct.
Independent committee reviewing complex cases and setting institutional standards.
A structured and supportive journey from first contact with the university to employment, designed to maximise student success.
A structured professional practice framework designed to produce industry-ready graduates with real-world competencies.
Academic briefing, health & safety training, and goal-setting with supervisor.
Formal internship agreement signed by university, student, and employer.
Structured workplace learning with regular diary and task completion.
Workplace supervisor provides a formal competency evaluation report.
Student presents internship outcomes; academic committee awards final grade.
Comprehensive support systems ensuring every student has the resources, guidance, and assistance needed to succeed academically and personally.
Individual consultations with academic advisors covering planning, course selection, and academic progress monitoring throughout the student journey.
Regular check-ins, early-alert systems for at-risk students, and personalised academic improvement plans.
Confidential counselling, mental health resources, and wellbeing programs to support students through academic challenges.
Specialised support for students with disabilities and diverse learning needs, ensuring full academic participation.
Career planning, employer networking events, CV workshops, and employment pathways from year one.
An evidence-based quality enhancement cycle embedded across all academic activities, programs, and institutional processes.
Setting quality targets, improvement objectives, and measurable performance indicators for the academic year.
Executing teaching, learning, and assessment activities aligned with the approved academic policy framework.
Collecting data through surveys, performance analysis, peer review, and external expert evaluation.
Acting on findings through targeted interventions, policy updates, and resource allocation.
Semesterly surveys measuring teaching quality, support services, and overall learning experience.
Annual follow-up surveys tracking employment outcomes and graduate satisfaction with preparation.
Structured employer engagement to align curriculum with industry competency requirements.
Peer observation, student rating systems, and faculty self-evaluation processes.
Annual program review reports assessing learning outcomes achievement and curriculum relevance.
Yessenov University's academic policy is aligned with global best practices, supporting mobility, partnerships, and international recognition.
International exchange programs enabling students to study one semester or a full year at partner institutions worldwide.
ECTS-compatible credit recognition procedures ensuring seamless academic mobility and transfer.
Co-designed educational programs with international partner universities and research centres.
Active collaboration with universities, research institutes, and industry partners across Europe, Asia, and beyond.
Formal procedures for recognising foreign qualifications, prior learning, and international credentials.
Academic governance and quality systems aligned with QS Stars and international ESG requirements.